domains / families / documents / venue-templates

venue-templates

combined

Prepares journal manuscripts, conference papers, research posters, and grant documents using venue-specific formatting guidance and bundled LaTeX scaffolds. Supports selecting an official template, checking current page or anonymity rules, adapting academic writing to a venue, or inspecting a submission PDF. Venue-specific LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for journals, conferences, posters, and grants—use when a target venue imposes strict layout, page limits, anonymization, or agency compliance rules.

When to use

• locating official journal or conference author instructions;
• checking page limits, required sections, anonymity, supplemental-material rules, or citation style;
• choosing and adapting a bundled LaTeX scaffold;
• preparing NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, or foundation proposal documents;
• designing a research poster after checking event-specific dimensions;
• adapting prose to a venue's audience and reviewer expectations; or
• inspecting a PDF's page count and embedded fonts.
• You are submitting a manuscript to a specific journal (e.g., Nature, Science, PLOS, Cell Press, IEEE, ACM) and must follow its official LaTeX class/style and author instructions.

When not to use

• treating stale formatting details as authoritative
• inferring a current style-file name by changing the year in an old filename
• presenting a generic scaffold as an official venue template
• submitting a combined bundled .tex file as an agency-issued form

Skill page

Conflict

The three copies overlap on the core task (finding venue rules, selecting LaTeX scaffolds, and checking compliance), but they disagree on scope and workflow. K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills is the most rigorous, emphasizing a verification-first workflow, a mandatory currency rule, and a compliance note, while explicitly warning that bundled files are scaffolds, not official templates. foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills and aipoch/medical-research-skills are more catalog-like, listing many venues and helper scripts, but they lack the strict currency verification and the explicit distinction between scaffolds and official templates. Crowning one would hide the real alternative of a verification-first approach versus a template-catalog approach.