domains / software-engineering / swiftui-performance-audit / swiftui-performance-audit

swiftui-performance-audit

Skill card

combined

The three copies overlap heavily on the core workflow (classify symptom, code-first review, guide profiling, analyze, remediate, verify), but each has material steps the others lack. Dimillian/Skills and sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills are near-identical and reference external files (references/code-smells.md, references/profiling-intake.md, references/report-template.md) that are not present in the skill text. LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills inlines a detailed code-smells catalog with concrete Swift examples and fixes, and adds a workflow decision tree, but omits the external reference files and the explicit intake checklist. Crowning one copy would hide either the external reference structure or the inlined remediation examples, so a combined instruction is needed.

Repositories

RepositoryPath
Dimillian/Skillsswiftui-performance-audit/SKILL.md
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skillsplugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/swiftui-performance-audit/SKILL.md
LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skillsskills/swiftui-performance-audit/SKILL.md

Other copies

RoleRepositoryPath
peerDimillian/Skillsswiftui-performance-audit/SKILL.md
peersickn33/agentic-awesome-skillsplugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/swiftui-performance-audit/SKILL.md
peerLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skillsskills/swiftui-performance-audit/SKILL.md
adaptersickn33/agentic-awesome-skillsplugins/agentic-awesome-skills/skills/swiftui-performance-audit/SKILL.md
adaptersickn33/agentic-awesome-skillsskills/swiftui-performance-audit/SKILL.md

Combined skill

# SwiftUI Performance Audit

## Quick start

Use this skill to diagnose SwiftUI performance issues from code first, then request profiling evidence when code review alone cannot explain the symptoms.

## When to Use
- When the user reports slow rendering, janky scrolling, layout thrash, or high CPU in SwiftUI.
- When you need a code-first audit plus Instruments guidance if profiling evidence is required.

## Workflow Decision Tree

- If the user provides code, start with "Code-First Review."
- If the user only describes symptoms, ask for minimal code/context, then do "Code-First Review."
- If code review is inconclusive, go to "Guide the User to Profile" and ask for a trace or screenshots.

## 1. Intake

Collect:
- Target view or feature code.
- Symptoms and exact reproduction steps.
- Data flow: `@State`, `@Binding`, environment dependencies, and observable models.
- Whether the issue shows up on device or simulator, and whether it was observed in Debug or Release.

Ask the user to classify the issue if possible:
- CPU spike or battery drain
- Janky scrolling or dropped frames
- High memory or image pressure
- Hangs or unresponsive interactions
- Excessive or unexpectedly broad view updates

## 2. Code-First Review

Focus on:
- Invalidation storms from broad observation or environment reads.
- Unstable identity in lists and `ForEach`.
- Heavy derived work in `body` or view builders.
- Layout thrash from complex hierarchies, `GeometryReader`, or preference chains.
- Large image decode or resize work on the main thread.
- Animation or transition work applied too broadly.

Provide:
- Likely root causes with code references.
- Suggested fixes and refactors.
- If needed, a minimal repro or instrumentation suggestion.

### Common Code Smells (and Fixes)

Look for these patterns during code review.

#### Expensive formatters in `body`

```swift
var body: some View {
    let number = NumberFormatter() // slow allocation
    let measure = MeasurementFormatter() // slow allocation
    Text(measure.string(from: .init(value: meters, unit: .meters)))
}
```

Prefer cached formatters in a model or a dedicated helper:

```swift
final class DistanceFormatter {
    static let shared = DistanceFormatter()
    let number = NumberFormatter()
    let measure = MeasurementFormatter()
}
```

#### Computed properties that do heavy work

```swift
var filtered: [Item] {
    items.filter { $0.isEnabled } // runs on every body eval
}
```

Prefer precompute or cache on change:

```swift
@State private var filtered: [Item] = []
// update filtered when inputs change
```

#### Sorting/filtering in `body` or `ForEach`

```swift
List {
    ForEach(items.sorted(by: sortRule)) { item in
        Row(item)
    }
}
```

Prefer sort once before view updates:

```swift
let sortedItems = items.sorted(by: sortRule)
```

#### Inline filtering in `ForEach`

```swift
ForEach(items.filter { $0.isEnabled }) { item in
    Row(item)
}
```

Prefer a prefiltered collection with stable identity.

#### Unstable identity

```swift
ForEach(items, id: \.self) { item in
    Row(item)
}
```

Avoid `id: \.self` for non-stable values; use a stable ID.

#### Image decoding on the main thread

```swift
Image(uiImage: UIImage(data: data)!)
```

Prefer decode/downsample off the main thread and store the result.

#### Broad dependencies in observable models

```swift
@Observable class Model {
    var items: [Item] = []
}

var body: some View {
    Row(isFavorite: model.items.contains(item))
}
```

Prefer granular view models or per-item state to reduce update fan-out.

## 3. Guide the User to Profile

If code review does not explain the issue, ask for runtime evidence:
- A trace export or screenshots of the SwiftUI timeline and Time Profiler call tree.
- Device/OS/build configuration.
- The exact interaction being profiled.
- Before/after metrics if the user is comparing a change.

Explain how to collect data with Instruments:
- Use the SwiftUI template in Instruments (Release build).
- Reproduce the exact interaction (scroll, navigation, animation).
- Capture SwiftUI timeline and Time Profiler.
- Export or screenshot the relevant lanes and the call tree.

## 4. Analyze and Diagnose

- Map the evidence to the most likely category: invalidation, identity churn, layout thrash, main-thread work, image cost, or animation cost.
- Prioritize problems by impact, not by how easy they are to explain.
- Distinguish code-level suspicion from trace-backed evidence.
- Call out when profiling is still insufficient and what additional evidence would reduce uncertainty.

## 5. Remediate

Apply targeted fixes:
- Narrow state scope and reduce broad observation fan-out.
- Stabilize identities for `ForEach` and lists.
- Move heavy work out of `body` into derived state updated from inputs, model-layer precomputation, memoized helpers, or background preprocessing. Use `@State` only for view-owned state, not as an ad hoc cache for arbitrary computation.
- Use `equatable()` only when equality is cheaper than recomputing the subtree and the inputs are truly value-semantic.
- Downsample images before rendering.
- Reduce layout complexity or use fixed sizing where possible.

## 6. Verify

Ask the user to re-run the same capture and compare with baseline metrics.
Summarize the delta (CPU, frame drops, memory peak) if provided.

## Outputs

Provide:
- A short metrics table (before/after if available).
- Top issues (ordered by impact).
- Proposed fixes with estimated effort.

## References

- Profiling intake and collection checklist: `references/profiling-intake.md`
- Common code smells and remediation patterns: `references/code-smells.md`
- Audit output template: `references/report-template.md`
- Add Apple documentation and WWDC resources under `references/` as they are supplied by the user.
- Optimizing SwiftUI performance with Instruments: `references/optimizing-swiftui-performance-instruments.md`
- Understanding and improving SwiftUI performance: `references/understanding-improving-swiftui-performance.md`
- Understanding hangs in your app: `references/understanding-hangs-in-your-app.md`
- Demystify SwiftUI performance (WWDC23): `references/demystify-swiftui-performance-wwdc23.md`

## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.