domains / software-engineering / constraint-driven-development / constraint-driven-development

constraint-driven-development

Skill card

authentic

The sickn33 copy is a faithful reproduction of the addyosmani skill, explicitly citing addyosmani/agent-skills as its source in the frontmatter. The body text, process steps, and constraints are identical. The addyosmani copy is the original, but the sickn33 copy is the one that explicitly documents its provenance and is a complete, addressable skill file in a catalog context. However, since the instruction is to find the procedure the others reproduce, and the sickn33 copy is a direct mirror of the addyosmani one, the addyosmani one is the 'authentic' source. Wait, the prompt says 'winner_occurrence_id is the chosen copy when decision is authentic'. Usually, the original is the winner. Let's look at the text. The addyosmani text is truncated at 'No sec'. The sickn33 text is truncated at 'gitleaks det'. They are effectively the same. The sickn33 copy has more metadata (source, license, etc.) which makes it a 'catalog' entry. The addyosmani one is the 'shipped skill folder'. The prompt asks to judge copies of one agent skill. The sickn33 copy is a copy of the addyosmani skill. Therefore, the addyosmani skill is the authentic procedure. I will select the addyosmani occurrence as the winner because it is the source. Correction: The prompt says 'winner_occurrence_id is the chosen copy when decision is authentic'. If I choose 'authentic', I must pick the one that is the 'procedure the others reproduce'. That is the addyosmani one. Let's re-read the prompt: 'decision is "authentic" when one copy is the procedure the others reproduce, shorten, or wrap.' The sickn33 copy wraps/reproduces the addyosmani copy. So addyosmani is the winner. Occurrence ID for addyosmani: `addyosmani/agent-skills::skills/constraint-driven-development/SKILL.md`

Repositories

Other copies