domains / families / science / jama-peer-review-revision

jama-peer-review-revision

separate

Use when responding to JAMA editor and reviewer comments after a revise decision, including the statistical-review queries. Structures the point-by-point response and revision; it does NOT fabricate new analyses or overstate changes.

When to use

• responding to JAMA editor and reviewer comments
• addressing statistical-review queries
• structuring point-by-point responses
• revising manuscript before writing response
• handling common JAMA comment types
• updating reporting checklists
• preparing tracked-changes and clean copies

When not to use

• fabricating new analyses
• overstating changes
• writing response before revising manuscript
• skipping uncomfortable comments
• claiming changes not reflected in manuscript
• defensive or dismissive tone
• presenting post hoc analyses as confirmatory
• reintroducing spin

Skill page

Source