domains / families / science / nature-reviews-physics
nature-reviews-physics
separate
Use when targeting Nature Reviews Physics (Nat Rev Phys) or deciding whether a review proposal across any area of physics fits this commissioned, authoritative review venue that publishes no primary research. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
When to use
- review, perspective, or roadmap for Nature Reviews Physics
- authoritative synthesis of a field rather than report new findings
- choosing between Nature Reviews Physics, Reviews of Modern Physics, and Reports on Progress in Physics
- commissioning model, breadth-of-audience expectations, and presubmission-enquiry process
- reviews of an active physics subfield aimed at a cross-disciplinary physics readership
- perspectives that frame an emerging direction, debate, or paradigm shift
- roadmaps and technical reviews assessing the state and trajectory of a measurement capability
- conceptual syntheses that connect developments across traditionally separate physics communities
When not to use
- primary research
- reporting new findings
- literature catalogue
- unsolicited proposals if not accepted by the journal
Skill page
Source