domains / families / science / percom-review-process

percom-review-process

separate

Use when reasoning about how an IEEE PerCom research submission is evaluated, covering double-blind review, the three-TPC-member model, the early-rejection stage, the single-round bounded rebuttal gated by a "weak accept," the accept/reject decision, and how PerCom's process differs from ACM UbiComp/IMWUT's journal revise cycle.

When to use

• reasoning about IEEE PerCom research submission evaluation
• understanding double-blind review and three-TPC-member model
• analyzing the early-rejection stage
• interpreting the single-round bounded rebuttal
• understanding accept/reject decision processes
• comparing PerCom process with ACM UbiComp/IMWUT
• reading a review packet and weighting reviews
• identifying author leverage points in the submission process

When not to use

• journal-style revise-and-resubmit cycles
• multi-deadline conference processes
• adding new experiments during rebuttal
• treating rebuttal as a debate or closing argument
• projecting IMWUT revise-and-resubmit mindset into PerCom

Skill page

Source