domains / families / research / novelty-vs-feasibility-assessor

novelty-vs-feasibility-assessor

separate

Assesses whether a medical research topic is worth starting now by separating true novelty from pseudo-novelty, auditing real feasibility under stated resource constraints, and forcing a concrete start / narrow / redesign / stop decision. Always require explicit assumptions and never fabricate references, datasets, resource availability, precedent studies, or publication claims.

When to use

• judging whether a topic is genuinely differentiated or superficially novel
• auditing realistic executability with current data, samples, tools, and timeline
• identifying the narrowest publishable or decision-useful version
• providing a start, narrow, redesign, delay, or stop recommendation
• balancing novelty, feasibility, execution burden, validation burden, and project value

When not to use

• patient-specific clinical decisions
• funding or investment guarantees
• fabricating precedent literature or dataset access claims
• promising publishability without evidence and constraints

Skill page

Source