domains / families / research / sigir-review-process

sigir-review-process

separate

Use when reasoning about how SIGIR evaluates submissions — the per-track OpenReview machinery, double-blind full/short review versus single-anonymous Resources review, the PC-member nomination duty, what IR reviewers score (evaluation validity above novelty claims), the ACM Peer Review Policy layer, and how decisions land.

When to use

• SIGIR submission evaluation
• OpenReview track mechanics
• Double-blind vs single-anonymous review
• PC-member nomination strategy
• IR reviewer scoring criteria
• ACM Peer Review Policy compliance
• Decision packet triage
• Reviewer archetype analysis

When not to use

• Exact 2026 rebuttal windows
• Specific score scales
• Meta-review form details
• Camera-ready formatting
• Author response drafting

Skill page

Source