domains / families / research / facct-review-process

facct-review-process

separate

Use when reasoning about how an ACM FAccT submission is evaluated — mutually-anonymous review by a mixed CS+law+social-science pool matched via author-selected focus areas, Area Chairs, the short factual-correction rebuttal, the new Accept/Revise/Reject decision with a revise-and-resubmit round, and how FAccT's interdisciplinary process differs from a pure-ML conference's single-shot rebuttal.

When to use

• reasoning about ACM FAccT submission evaluation
• understanding mutually-anonymous review by mixed CS+law+social-science pool
• analyzing Area Chairs and focus area matching
• interpreting the short factual-correction rebuttal
• understanding the Accept/Revise/Reject decision process
• comparing FAccT's interdisciplinary process to pure-ML conferences
• planning author leverage during submission and revision stages
• reading and weighting review packets

When not to use

• tasks not related to ACM FAccT review process

Skill page

Source