domains / families / research / est-revision-and-rebuttal

est-revision-and-rebuttal

separate

Use when writing the response to an Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) revision decision. ES&T decisions are editor-led on the back of typically three expert reviews, so the response must convert each reviewer with evidence and QA/QC while keeping the editor confident. It structures the response letter and revision; it does not fabricate new results.

When to use

• planning the revision + response letter
• reconciling demands from disagreeing reviewers
• responding to requests for new experiments, controls, or analyses
• writing the cover note to the editor summarizing the revision
• answering analytical asks with concrete evidence
• reconciling conflicting reviewers openly
• protecting the contribution and environmental-significance claim

When not to use

• fabricating new results

Skill page

Source