domains / families / research / podc-author-response

podc-author-response

separate

Use when writing an ACM PODC rebuttal/author response, if the cycle runs one — covering how to correct a proof misreading, supply a missing lemma or bound within the anonymity envelope, prioritize soundness questions over taste, and behave correctly given that PODC has no revision round to fall back on.

When to use

• Writing an ACM PODC rebuttal
• Correcting a proof misreading
• Supplying a missing lemma or bound
• Prioritizing soundness questions over taste
• Answering reviewer questions on correctness and model assumptions
• Maintaining double-blind anonymity in the response

When not to use

• Arguing taste or significance
• Adding a new result
• Contesting a real proof gap
• Planning a rebuttal if the cycle does not have one
• De-anonymizing in the response text or links

Skill page

Source