domains / families / research / stoc-review-process

stoc-review-process

separate

Use when reasoning about how a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) submission is evaluated — the SIGACT program-committee model with external subreviewers, HotCRP mechanics, double-blind conflicts, the November-to-February decision arc, and what best-paper designation and rejection each actually mean.

When to use

• STOC submission evaluation
• SIGACT program-committee model
• external subreviewers
• HotCRP mechanics
• double-blind conflicts
• November-to-February decision arc
• best-paper designation
• rejection meanings

When not to use

• author response strategies
• topic selection
• workflow planning

Skill page

Source