domains / families / research / ipsn-review-process

ipsn-review-process

separate

Use when reasoning about how an IPSN-lineage submission is evaluated, covering double-blind review, the per-track (IP / SPOTS) program committees, the rebuttal, Best Paper and Best Research Artifact judging, and how IPSN's process differs from SenSys's revision model, OpenReview venues, and CPS-IoT Week neighbors.

When to use

• IPSN submission evaluation
• double-blind review process
• IP and SPOTS track program committees
• rebuttal opportunities
• Best Paper and Best Research Artifact judging
• differences from SenSys revision model
• differences from OpenReview venues
• differences from CPS-IoT Week neighbors

When not to use

• journal-style Major Revision
• treating rebuttal as a debate
• assuming successor keeps exact IPSN mechanics

Skill page

Source