domains / families / research / mind-review-process

mind-review-process

separate

Use to understand how Mind evaluates a submission — triple-anonymous peer review, quality as the sole criterion, the role of expert referees, and what it means for a journal that receives over 800 submissions a year. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

When to use

• stress-test against the way Mind judges papers
• interpreting a decision letter
• understanding why anonymization is non-negotiable
• deciding whether a piece is competitive
• shaping the paper to pass review
• review-risk pass for Mind

When not to use

• contacting editors

Skill page

Source