domains / families / research / jop-data-analysis
jop-data-analysis
separate
Use for analysis-stage decisions on a The Journal of Politics (JOP) manuscript — uncertainty, robustness, and reporting norms — written so the work is reproducible from line one. JOP makes acceptance contingent on replicability and a JOP replication analyst re-runs the code, so every reported number must come from a script. Guides analysis; it does not fabricate results.
When to use
- Setting up the estimation/analysis pipeline
- Deciding which robustness checks belong in the main text vs the Online Appendix
- Responding to reviewer requests for additional specifications, uncertainty, or sensitivity
- Preparing numbers that must match the deposited replication package exactly
- Reporting uncertainty, CIs, SEs, and substantive effect sizes
- Ensuring specification transparency and targeted robustness
- Fitting the analysis to the page budget
- Executing analysis via StatsPAI or Stata MCP
When not to use
- Fabricating results
- Hand-editing tables and figures
- Reporting numbers that the deposited code cannot reproduce
- Using unseeded randomness or unpinned versions
- Star-gazing with no effect sizes or uncertainty
- Choosing robustness checks to inflate the count rather than rebut a threat
- Cramming every specification into the main text
Skill page
Source