domains / families / research / icalp-review-process

icalp-review-process

separate

Use when reasoning about how an ICALP (EATCS) submission is evaluated, covering lightweight double-blind review, the separate Track A and Track B program committees, the asymmetric author interaction (Track B rebuttal vs Track A correctness-only contact), correctness-driven acceptance, the single accept/reject decision, and how ICALP's process differs from STOC/FOCS/SODA.

When to use

• reasoning about ICALP submission evaluation
• understanding lightweight double-blind review
• analyzing Track A and Track B program committees
• evaluating asymmetric author interaction
• assessing correctness-driven acceptance
• interpreting single accept/reject decisions
• comparing ICALP process to STOC/FOCS/SODA

When not to use

• journal-style major revision processes
• US-venue specific processes
• appeals after rejection

Skill page

Source