domains / families / research / grant-mock-reviewer

grant-mock-reviewer

separate

Simulate structured grant peer review for biomedical proposals; use when stress-testing significance, innovation, approach, feasibility, and reviewer-facing weaknesses before submission.

When to use

• Use this skill when the task needs Simulates NIH study section peer review for grant proposals. Triggers.
• Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
• Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.

When not to use

• Cannot access external literature to verify claims
• May not capture domain-specific methodological nuances
• Scoring is simulated and may not match actual study section scores
• Best used as preparatory tool, not replacement for human review
• Do not proceed when required input files, identifiers, parameters, or context are missing — ask the user to provide them first.
• Do not assume capabilities beyond this skill's declared scope when the user requests external operations or inferences.
• Do not proceed without user confirmation when overwriting existing results, executing high-cost batch operations, or expanding task scope.

Skill page

Source