domains / families / research / research-grants

research-grants

combined

Supports research proposal preparation and review for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC, including opportunity-specific requirements, aims, review criteria, budgets, broader impacts, forms, and resubmissions. Use for investigator-authored grant development, compliance matrices, and proposal critiques. Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan's NSTC when you need agency-compliant narratives, budgets, and review-criteria alignment for a specific solicitation/FOA/BAA.

When to use

• Writing research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, or NSTC programs
• Preparing project descriptions, specific aims, or technical narratives
• Developing broader impacts or significance statements
• Creating research timelines and milestone plans
• Preparing budget justifications and personnel allocation plans
• Responding to program solicitations or funding announcements
• Addressing reviewer comments in resubmissions
• Planning multi-institutional collaborative proposals

When not to use

• Substantially developing applications or sections for NIH using AI

Skill page

Conflict

The copies share the same core agency overviews and use cases, but they disagree on critical procedural constraints. The K-Dense-AI copy (v1.5) explicitly treats figures as optional and includes a strict NIH policy warning against AI-substantial authorship, requiring a compliance matrix. The brycewang-stanford copy mandates figures as a hard requirement. The aipoch copy adds specific local script dependencies (compliance_checker.py, budget_calculator.py) and a reference-driven drafting workflow. The foryourhealth111-pixel copy explicitly rejects the mandatory figure requirement. Because these copies contain conflicting instructions on whether figures are required and different levels of procedural detail (compliance matrices vs. local scripts), crowning one would hide real alternatives.