domains / families / research / research-review
Get a deep critical review of research from GPT via Codex MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results. Get a deep critical review of research from an external reviewer backend (Codex or manual). Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.
The two copies implement the same multi-round external research review workflow, but they disagree on the reviewer backend, model, reasoning effort, MCP setup, and prompt structure. The wanshuiyin copy is a more evolved, backend-routed version (Codex or Manual) with a file-based brief, adversarial framing, and explicit scope limits. The brycewang copy is a simpler Codex-only version with inline context, xhigh reasoning, and a set of follow-up prompt templates. Neither is a strict reproduction of the other; crowning one would hide a real alternative (manual backend vs Codex-only, file brief vs inline context, ultra vs xhigh).