domains / families / research / sosp-review-process

sosp-review-process

separate

Use when reasoning about how a SOSP submission is evaluated — double-blind HotCRP reviewing, staged review rounds, PC-chair-audited conflicts, the pre-PC-meeting author response, the single-track PC meeting where every decision is argued live, notification, and shepherded acceptance outcomes.

When to use

• modeling SOSP paper evaluation between April upload and July decision
• timing author-side actions to review phases
• reading and triaging SOSP reviews
• identifying meeting risks and score-driving issues
• calibrating expectations for SOSP acceptance
• checking confidentiality and integrity edges

When not to use

• writing the author response
• planning camera-ready submission
• writing style guidance
• related work positioning
• retargeting workflow mapping

Skill page

Source