domains / families / research / bgpt-paper-search

bgpt-paper-search

combined

Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server. Returns 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details not available in abstracts alone. Searches BGPT scientific papers by topic or DOI and retrieves claim-level evidence extracted from full text, including experiments, reported statistics, scope, limitations, and provenance. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details beyond abstracts.

When to use

• Searching for scientific papers with specific experimental details
• Conducting systematic or scoping literature reviews
• Finding quantitative results, sample sizes, or effect sizes across studies
• Comparing methodologies used in different studies
• Looking for papers with quality scores or evidence grading
• Needing structured data from full-text papers (not just abstracts)
• Building evidence tables for meta-analyses or clinical guidelines
• Use BGPT to find full-text-derived evidence for a research question or a known DOI. It returns extracted claims and their supporting experiments, rather than only bibliographic metadata. Use these records to build a traceable evidence tabl…

When not to use

• Complete systematic-review search
• Validated risk-of-bias assessment

Skill page

Conflict

The two copies describe the same BGPT MCP paper-search skill but disagree on the tool contract, connection method, and result semantics. The K-Dense copy is a newer, schema-checked contract (v1.3, 2026-09-30) that documents specific tool arguments (num_results, days_back, min_citations, study_type, output_format), distinguishes evidence/full/legacy formats, and warns that returned records may lack claim-level provenance. The FreedomIntelligence copy is an older, higher-level overview that advertises 25+ fields, quality scores, and a free tier of 50 searches, and recommends the SSE endpoint and the bgpt-mcp npm package. Because each copy contains material steps or constraints the other lacks, and they conflict on the result contract and setup, crowning one would hide a real alternative.