domains / families / research / response-tone-polisher

response-tone-polisher

separate

Polish reviewer-response letters by softening defensive language, preserving factual meaning, and keeping responses professional, concise, and publication-appropriate.

When to use

• Use this skill when the task needs Polishes response letters by transforming defensive or harsh language.
• Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
• Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.

When not to use

• Does not verify scientific accuracy of responses
• Requires human review for complex nuanced disagreements
• May over-soften; authors should verify position is still clear
• Best for English-language responses
• Do not proceed when required input files, identifiers, parameters, or context are missing — ask the user to provide them first.
• Do not assume capabilities beyond this skill's declared scope when the user requests external operations or inferences.
• Do not proceed without user confirmation when overwriting existing results, executing high-cost batch operations, or expanding task scope.

Skill page

Source