domains / families / research / conext-review-process

conext-review-process

separate

Use when reasoning about how an ACM CoNEXT submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the two-round TPC process with online discussion and a TPC meeting, the Accept / Reject / one-shot "major" revision decision categories, the journal-style revise-and-resubmit re-read by the original reviewers, shepherding, and how CoNEXT's two-cycle process differs from SIGCOMM and NSDI.

When to use

• reasoning about ACM CoNEXT submission evaluation
• understanding double-anonymous review
• modeling the two-round TPC process
• interpreting Accept, Reject, and major revision decisions
• understanding journal-style revise-and-resubmit
• comparing CoNEXT process with SIGCOMM and NSDI

When not to use

• interpreting single reviews without process context
• assuming CoNEXT shares calendar or template with SIGCOMM
• carrying NSDI timing or format to CoNEXT
• treating major revision as guaranteed accept
• treating response as a debate

Skill page

Source