domains / families / research / academic-paper-reviewer

academic-paper-reviewer

combined

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정, revisar artículo, revisión entre pares, revisión de manuscrito, informe de árbitro, revisa mi artículo, criticar artículo, simular revisión, revisión editorial, calibrar revisor. Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

When to use

• full review
• re-review (verification)
• quick assessment
• methodology focus
• Socratic guided
• calibration modes
• peer review
• manuscript review

When not to use

• screening records
• writing a literature review
• running a systematic review
• meta-analysis
• PRISMA report

Skill page

Conflict

The two copies describe the same multi-perspective academic paper review workflow but disagree on the reviewer panel composition and include materially different operational content. The Imbad0202 copy (v1.11.1) uses a Journal-Fit Reviewer plus 3 peer reviewers plus a Devil's Advocate, adds a calibration mode, and contains a detailed routing/escape-hatch protocol. The brycewang-stanford copy (v1.4) uses an Editor-in-Chief plus 3 peer reviewers plus a Devil's Advocate, omits calibration, and provides a Quick Start, trigger/non-trigger table, and a 7-agent orchestration diagram. Crowning one would hide the alternative panel structure and the distinct routing or quick-start guidance.