domains / families / research / acm-conference-on-fairness-accountability-and-transparency
acm-conference-on-fairness-accountability-and-transparency
separate
Use when targeting ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for responsible AI.
When to use
- targeting ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT)
- deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue
- conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for responsible AI
- manuscript in fairness needs a conference-fit read before being formatted or submitted
- re-framed from journal style or arXiv style into a selective CS conference narrative
- evidence-gap, anonymity, artifact, rebuttal, or re-routing diagnosis for this venue
- fairness, accountability, transparency, audits, policy, measurement, and socio-technical AI systems
- responsible-AI paper whose claims are grounded in both technical measurement and social context
When not to use
- substitute for the current year's CFP, author kit, ethics policy, or submission portal
- generic CS paper until the introduction names the exact subcommunity, contribution type, and proof or empirical standard
- broader AI ethics and policy work to AIES
- collaboration/social-platform studies to CSCW
- pure ML methods to ML venues unless accountability or fairness is central
- method-only fairness can fit NeurIPS/ICML
Skill page
Source