domains / families / documents / treatment-plans

treatment-plans

combined

Generate concise (3-4 page), focused medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF format for all clinical specialties. Supports general medical treatment, rehabilitation therapy, mental health care, chronic disease management, perioperative care, and pain management. Includes SMART goal frameworks, evidence-based interventions with minimal text citations, regulatory compliance (HIPAA), and professional formatting. Prioritizes brevity and clinical actionability. Formats and structurally validates local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals. Use for source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, and release gates—not for clinical decision-making.

When to use

• Creating individualized treatment plans for patient care
• Documenting therapeutic interventions for chronic disease management
• Developing rehabilitation programs (physical therapy, occupational therapy, cardiac rehab)
• Writing mental health and psychiatric treatment plans
• Planning perioperative and surgical care pathways
• Establishing pain management protocols
• Setting patient-centered goals using SMART criteria
• Coordinating multidisciplinary care across specialties

Skill page

Conflict

The copies define two different procedures for the same skill name. K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills treats treatment-plans as a documentation-only formatting/validation workflow that explicitly forbids clinical decision-making, uses local JSON templates, and requires a DRAFT notice and release gate. The other three copies (Vibe-Skills, medical-research-skills, OpenClaw-Medical-Skills) treat it as a LaTeX/PDF generation workflow that creates concise clinical treatment plans, includes SMART goals, evidence-based interventions, and mandatory AI-generated schematics. These are not shortenings or wrappers of one another; they disagree on purpose, output format, safety scope, and required steps, so crowning one would hide a real alternative.